Xiaomi finally announced the much awaited (and even more leaked)Β Redmi Pro.
Like the rest of the internet world, if you’ve been left wondering about the Redmi Pro, this post here should tell you a thing or ten about this new mid-range killer!
1. The Xiaomi Redmi Pro is powered by the top-of-the-line 10-core Mediatek technology.
The Xiaomi Redmi Pro features the most powerful Mediatek 10-core processor on the market, clocked at 2.5GHz.
It also includes the excellentΒ Mali-880 GPU and ensures a 30% improved efficiency over other chipsets with similar technology.
2. The Redmi Pro is Xiaomi’s first phone with dual rear cameras.
The Xiaomi Redmi Pro featuresΒ two camerasΒ at the rear in order to create photos withΒ shallowΒ depth of field and thus have a blurry background, whichΒ is called bokeh in photography lingo.
This result is achieved by using a primary camera, the 13-megapixel Sony IMX258 equippedΒ with an aperture of F/2.0 in this case, and a secondary 5-megapixel Samsung cameraΒ for depth information logging.
Then a dedicated ImagiQ image processorΒ doesΒ the magic.
3. It is the first Xiaomi phone to have an OLED display.
Redmi Pro will be the first Xiaomi smartphone to boastΒ aΒ 5.5-inch Full HD OLED display. The OLED technology allows the displayΒ to have aΒ very high contrast ratio (60000:1) and vivid colors.
Surely a great addition in a mid-range smartphone!
4. …and a front-facing fingerprint sensor.
The Redmi Pro is the first device of the Redmi product line with a fingerprint sensor on the front. This may not seem very important by itself, but overallΒ it shows how Xiaomi are keen on getting their ergonomics right.
Completely redesigning the device in order to fit the second camera on the back, while keeping such an important feature as the fingerprint sensor.
5. The Xiaomi Redmi Pro will be the first new Xiaomi phone to ship with MIUI 8.
The Xiaomi Redmi Pro will be the first device to runΒ MIUI 8 out of the box. The new MIUI OSΒ which was announced last month, is still in beta onΒ a great amount of Redmi devices, so this is something that should make you happy.
Gizchina News of the week
6. It boasts a USB Type-C charging connector.
As the market seems to be getting away from the Micro-USB standard, also Xiaomi decided to drop it and boast a new USB Type-C port. Which allows for reversible plug orientation and thus making your life easier.
7.Β The Xiaomi Redmi Pro features CNC chamfered edges, 2.5D curved glass, and more.
The Redmi Pro features a full metal unibody designΒ with a brushed metal finish andΒ CNC chamfered edges, the OLED display is covered with a 2.5DΒ shaped glass which improves both the look and feel of the device.
8. There are three variants of the Xiaomi Redmi Pro.
The Xiaomi Redmi Pro will be available in three different variants, so that you can decide between saving money or having better performance overall.
The least powerful Redmi Pro comes with a Mediatek Helio X20, 3GB of RAM and 32GB of storage.
While the most powerful Redmi Pro’s featuring a Mediatek Helio X25, come in two configurations, one with 3GB and 64GB of storage, the other one 4GB of RAM and 128GB of internal storage.
More info about the variants here.
9. You can either use Dual SIMΒ or Single SIM + Micro SD on the Redmi Pro.
You might not need two SIMs, but I’m pretty sure you will like the possibility of adding a Micro SD to store your movies and what else. Not that many smartphones still give you thisΒ choice,Β so I thought you’ll find it a useful info!
10. And finally, Pricing & Availability.
TheΒ Redmi Pro starts selling at 1499 Yuan ($225) for the 3GB RAM + 32GB (Helio X20) version, rising to 1699 Yuan ($255) for the 3GB RAM + 64GB Mediatek Helio X25 powered model, while the flagship 4GB RAM + 128GB variant will cost 1999 Yuan ($300).
It’ll be on sale in China from August 6th. Stay tuned to Redmi Pro news on GizChina!
While specs are all very good, for a mid range priced phone, final verdict will only depend upon the execution of amalgamation of hardware and software in this , much hyped phone.
Indeed, I agree and waiting for first review
Indeed the Mi 5 turned out not to be the bargain its spec sheet suggested
The Mi5 suffered from software issues in the first few months of launch, most of those have been ironed out and now it is a great bargain.
the zuk z2 also lookss good for 4/64, 3500mah and 270β¬ price tag atleast for my market with everything included..sure for 30β¬ more i can get the mi 5 with a better camera probably but also less storage and ram..even tho its ufs 2 storage
i guess everyone can pick a great device nowadays..there are so many options
Will the Mi Note 2 Pro have software issues at launch ?
Who knows
Would that deter you from buying it at launch or would you wait 6 – 8 weeks then purchase it ?
With some companies yes. Xiaomi most likely not as I know they will fix whatever is wrong with it (as long as it is software based).
Maybe, maybe not. You never know if a phone will or won’t.
It’s usual from xiaomi having sw issues at first, especially in battery department. Maybe it’s safer to say “not perfectly optimized and at its full potential” more than “issues”, but the thing stays the same. So probably even mi note 2 will have something which needs a couple of update to be fixed… The thing is: with xiaomi you’re sure they’ll fix that sooner or later…
does it have FM radio
does it have gorilla glass 3 or 4
No mention of protection
FM radio is a standar feature for Mediatek’s SoCs until now. So I think the same applies to this one.
Fantastic PHONE *_*
While specs are all very good, for a mid range priced phone, final verdict will only depend upon the execution of amalgamation of hardware and software in this , much hyped phone.
Indeed, I agree and waiting for first review
Indeed the Mi 5 turned out not to be the bargain its spec sheet suggested
The Mi5 suffered from software issues in the first few months of launch, most of those have been ironed out and now it is a great bargain.
the zuk z2 also lookss good for 4/64, 3500mah and 270β¬ price tag atleast for my market with everything included..sure for 30β¬ more i can get the mi 5 with a better camera probably but also less storage and ram..even tho its ufs 2 storage
i guess everyone can pick a great device nowadays..there are so many options
Will the Mi Note 2 Pro have software issues at launch ?
Who knows
Maybe, maybe not. You never know if a phone will or won’t.
It’s usual from xiaomi having sw issues at first, especially in battery department. Maybe it’s safer to say “not perfectly optimized and at its full potential” more than “issues”, but the thing stays the same. So probably even mi note 2 will have something which needs a couple of update to be fixed… The thing is: with xiaomi you’re sure they’ll fix that sooner or later…
Would that deter you from buying it at launch or would you wait 6 – 8 weeks then purchase it ?
With some companies yes. Xiaomi most likely not as I know they will fix whatever is wrong with it (as long as it is software based).
does it have FM radio
does it have gorilla glass 3 or 4
No mention of protection
FM radio is a standar feature for Mediatek’s SoCs until now. So I think the same applies to this one.
Do you think that this phone is better choise than the mi5?
No way!
I have read about heating issue with X20 and X25? Is that for real or it depends on the software? I am really interested to get the Redmi Pro but can’t decide which one to buy.
from what i read they do have heating issues, i saw the qiku n4s reaching 49 degrees even the apollo lite get hot but not too hot tho so i guess it depends on the individual phone’s optimization but maybe generalizing of it having heat issues isnt far off
Thanks, I think that some CPU are heating because the system/software isn’t exploiting the processor’s power well. I mean heavy system can cause heating. I really hope that Redmi Pro will not present that kind of problem.
I saw it too 49Β°degree it is insanely hot .mediatek processor are shit.it is always better to use qualcomm processors
49 isn’t overheating that is normal operating temperature. Most SD phones run even hotter than that. My Nextbit Robin with a SD808 is currently running at 47 and it’s just sitting on my desk. The SD820 can reach over 90 when pushed to it’s limit.
SD 808 isn’t a powerfull prossesor but let’s wait for a review
see these videos below
Exynos 8 Octa 8890 vs MTK6797 Helio X20 Deca Core”
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DI41-PyuaP4
”
Vernee Apollo Lite Multi-task Test: Fast and Smooth”
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zCH5GHtOESQ
”
Apollo Lite CPU Real Time Status Demonstration”
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JaapPMqoFvk
I’ll buy a MediaTek phone only if it can exceed an SD 820 based phone (i.e. a prime flagship) on every real-world as well as synthetic test, graphics included, by HUGE margins (as in enough to make it look like a two or three generation leap) while costing half the price.
Otherwise, like Vince McMahon says – “No chance”. π My fat money is reserved STRICTLY for QualComm or Samsung, meanwhile the nickels and dimes are always available for a cheap-ass MediaTek.
It is true that mediatek x20 and x25 are fast but they hit up and not freindly with battery.but just wait for a review the redmi seem good on paper
The plastic back is worse at dissipating heat and that’s a factor.
And,just in case, the SoC overheating and the back of the phone heating up are 2 very diff things. The back is about your comfort,nothing more. The SoC overheating is about throttling , in general they have diff limits. Lets say at 90C they start to throttle, at 100C they take more drastic measures and shut some cores off and at 110C the device turns off. That’s just a simplified example,there is more going on and the limits will differ from SoC to SoC and device to device. Haven’t found yet good info on how this thing throttles so can’t help with that.
If you are curious,in the device thermals section towards the bottom of the page you can see how a few diff phones with SD810 throttled in diff ways- don’t have a more recent link to illustrate the point http://www.anandtech.com/show/9878/the-huawei-mate-8-review/5
Edit: that doesn’t mean in any way that i condone throttling. if there is a ” turbo” mode where the SoC goes to speeds it can’t sustained,it should be properly defined.
oh i see, yeah i forgot this too is a reason why glass backs gets so hot
One weird thing about the Redmi Pro ,they don’t list wifi ac.If you plan to buy it and if wifi ac matters,better make sure it’s there.
hmm alright im kinda iffy because redmi cameras arent usually good
a short look at the cam, not easy to understand much with Google Translate but info is scarce for now http://news.mydrivers.com/1/493/493086_1.htm
Depends on a lot of factors: software, build materials, other components used. After the disaster of the SD810/615 overheating is an issue that was never even thought of before. Most people mistake normal operating temperature with overheating because of that fiasco last year. They report overheating anytime the phone gets hot even when it’s normal. All phones will get hot under stress, it’s the nature of the product. The tests I have seen of various X20/25 phones has them in normal operating range.
also for people that think that the Snapdragon version is superior people complained about the idol 4s inr eviews that while the day 2 day performance is fine when recording videos it throttles down a lot..just like the sony phone….
so while i think that the 652 is great even it can get to its limits especially in such hot summer days
Exynos 8 Octa 8890 vs MTK6797 Helio X20 Deca Core”
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DI41-PyuaP4
”
Vernee Apollo Lite Multi-task Test: Fast and Smooth”
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zCH5GHtOESQ
”
Apollo Lite CPU Real Time Status Demonstration”
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JaapPMqoFvk
this competes with the apollo lite and qiku n4s kinda hard o pick one XD, sensors is one thing but what is the lens architecture how many elements and are these elements glass or plastic and lastly the BIG daddy software what dem algorithms looking like, ziaomi’s histroy of cameras is subpar but lets see
360 n4s 5000mah ,16 mpx rear camera and cheaper
16mp camera means next to nothing without the rest of the camera specs and a full review. More MP’s doesn’t mean a better camera.
I agree but mediatek chips are crap trust me .this phone is awesome only if it has snapdragon ship. But wait for a real review
“trust me”. Who are you exactly? And why would I “trust” you and not my own experience? I have used every one of the current Mediatek chips. The X20/25 is far from “crap”, it is an excellent all around chip.
ok, i will trust you even if i don’t know you but wait until review come!!
I never said to trust me. I just know from my own experience the X20 used in this phone is a good chip.
If I was picking between those 3 I would go with Xiaomi just because I trust the company more with future updates.
valid point
valid point and there maybe more reasons i doubt qiku will have a international rom so it google services gambling if it will work properly or not, one thing i realize too is if i get a vernee since i dont have that EURO type socket ill probably get a non quick charge charger just like what ahppened to me with my cubot h1… and the thing will take almost 8 HOURS!!!!! to fully charge without quick charge
Love the specs, hate the overpriced product.
Just curious why you think it is overpriced?
i dont understand why people say its overpriced
Maybe because it costs almost like mi5 (at least the price that the resellers are asking for it right now)
maybe after the hype dies down the pricing between the two will stabilize
Because it has a Mediatek chip I am guessing. Many people are still suck in 2012 when MTK produced cheap chips with terrible GPS and performance. I read comments all the time on other sites that are so misinformed and clueless. Many people only look at the SoC and then say X phone is too overpriced, they forget about the other dozen components.
i really believe its the SOC thing, ” why buy a mtk phone for 250″ etc it doenst matter if the phone has 64gb memory good camera etc etc its juts MTK phone must be cheap because we are just buying a chip
vs the 360 N4 and N4S? This one is two thirds more than the N4 for the base model. 899CNY vs 1499CNY. And you get less RAM and lower resolution screen. Same cam but this one has the depth of field gimmick that doesn’t work well from what i’ve seen in the Chinese press.
You also got the LeEco devices with X20 and X25 and even the Redmi Note 3 Pro 3GB at 1099CNY can be considered a competitor. At least you don’t get the pseudo-1080p display with that one.
In China the expectations were for a lower price too. When they announced pricing people got stuck for a bit instead of the usual cheers.
i might just go for the n4s
360 might also have the Q4 or Q5 Lite soon.That might be with SD652 and dual cam. We’ll see.
ZUK Z2 Rio is at 1499CNY too with 5inch 108p LCD and SD820.
If you go higher, Huawei, LeEco got interesting things,better value than MI5.
Whatever floats your boat.
lol everytime i end up confused maybe i should wait till the end of the year XD
What do you care about? CPU,GPU,cam,VR?
Kirin 950 is the best in CPU,SD820 in GPU for the most part but you can do with less at 1080p, X20 is flagship like CPU perf and good enough GPU for1080p at good value.
If you don’t care about perf you go with A53x8 for good battery. -P10 or better like Kirin 650 or SD625.
If you want VR,better wait for Daydream compatible devices. ZTE claims the Axon 7 will support Daydream,the only such device so far.
good gaming performance, alright camera in artificial lighting and daylight, and a big battery if it doesnt have a big battery then ok sized battey with nice quick charge on a budget 270 max
Dear friend, past with expensive phone (280 dollars) I to download MediaTek Uncle Tools for GPS and tried everything not still work. Sometime their EPO file server not reachable, so no way to update EPO. π So GPS problems is true. Performance was ok.
Sorry for bad english.
What phone did you have? Mediatek used to have terrible GPS but all their current products are fine.
What was the phone? Does the gps works at all?
They still produce bad SoC’s regarding your user experience & their is no much difference in pricing per gate compared to QC.
Tought you don’t like horrible pen tile based AMOLEDS & gimmick rather bad dual camera’s?
All do they are the reason why it costs more, personally I do like AMOLEDS…
I have no issue with AMOLED’s…. That is realjjj you are thinking. I prefer LCD but I don’t have an issue with AMOLED.
take a look at zuk z2 Rio with SD820, MTK X20 and the redmi pro is not in the same category but cost the same $225. Why? for one extra 5MP camera buyers should pay extra $$$ as the phone is unique, it is not.
Because you are only looking at one component, the CPU. A lot more goes into the price of a phone than just the CPU. The Redmi Pro has a bigger battery, better camera, Micro SD support and it comes from a better brand. Zuk is good but they don’t have the reputation that Xiaomi does. Both phones are good value for the money, but they each offer something different. The Zuk is better for hardcore gamers, the Redmi Pro is better for people who value the camera.
Instead for z2 you’ll pay for smaller battery, no microsd, cheap build quality, weak camera and screen… There are still chances redmi pro to be even worse than this, we’ll have to see when the sw will be on point in actual reviews, but for now that’s what we know about z2, and it doesn’t seems like the best deal in the world even with that soc at that price
Spot on and same feelings here.
For a phone with that X25, I was expecting the price to be around US$ 159.99 and no more. However, at the mentioned prices, I might as well have gone for a Snapdragon based phone?
It seems MediaTek doesn’t have a price advantage anymore, or maybe it’s the phone manufacturers who have decided to overprice their phones? I dunno, but these prices for MediaTek phones is insane.
Fantastic PHONE *_*
I never understood why/how having the fingertip sensor in the front is thought as ergonomically correct. It needs two hands (one to hold the phone and another to unlock) + it makes the profile bigger by making the “chin” of the phone unnecessarily bigger.
To me it’s clearly the wrong position, chosen in the sorry attempt to imitate Apple without thinking that Apple actually had a good reason to put the sensor there (it already doubles as their home button).
Google tried to make phones simpler by removing dedicating keys, and now we see their return for silly reasons, that I don’t get. Especially ergonomically speaking it’s the worse route. What’s good for the small iPhone does not translate well to the big androids…
I sit at my desk with my phone facing me, reach over with one thumb I can unlock it and see who texted, called or emailed me. All while still typing on my computer or talking on the phone. With the back sensor it always requires you to pick up the phone. Now do you understand?
on smaller like 5-5,3″ atleast for me it is now issue to reach the button with a finger with jsut one hand..like thats the point o.o if i couldnt reach the bottom anyway with a hand it would feel wierd to me…actually even on my le max 2 with 5,7″ i can reach the bottom mid easily with one hand and my thumb
Or you know double tap the screen and do the same thing, by glancing the lock screen.
Like I said, unergonomic position employed by some in a sorry attempt to imitate Apple. Now all phones finally achived the kind of chins that Apple has on their phones, Apple won, not by making ergonomical their phone, but by making everybody else’s less ergonomical.
Double tap doesnt work when my phone is locked with a fingerprint.
What this really comes down to is Stef doesn’t like front buttons. Everything else you said was pure nonsense.
Heh, unlocking your phone for quick glances are nonsense. That is what lock screens are for. Eliminating the locks creep is the kind of nonsense that new Apple pulls.
Like I said, look a their sales , there is not a single category of theirs that does well compared to last year. Apple TV is toast, Apple watch, don’t ever talk about that, iPad have losing sales for years by now, iPhonesjust posted a 2nd fail quarter in row.
If this is where you get your ideas good luck. Nobody likes big chins , it makes phones more uncomfortable to use, that is the point of ergonomics, finding common ground on what is comfortable or not. Ben AAffect chins are hugely uncomfortable.
“Unlocking for quick glances is nonsense”. Maybe for you it is, for anyone who uses their phone for business it is far from “nonsense”, it is a necessity.
This argument has nothing to do with Apple or their Sales.
“Nobody likes big chins”. Do you have anything to back that up other than your opinion? I have evidence that suggests otherwise. All of them following sites did polls about fingerprint location and here are the % of those who prefer front:
Android Authority – 37%
Droid Life – 30%
Pocket Now – 60%
Phone Arena – 40% (tied with side for first)
I guess you missed all these polls, it seems a lot of people do like them. Once again you think your opinion speaks for everyone.
I’m using my phone for business, I can’t be bothered with a full unlock, it takes way too much of my precious time. Instead I glance the lockscreen like a normal human being and then unlock if necessary…
Hehe, online polls. Like I said “nobody likes big chins”, it has nothing to do with what looks good, it has to do with how easily one can store/use a phone. Big bezeled phones like iPhone plus take a thumbs down , almost universally, for their bad ergonomics. Good luck in proving that a giant chin is good for ergonomics.
People may prefer the FF fingertip because they are accustomed to the look, that tells me nothing, it is still a bad idea.
When I am in a meeting, on the phone, typing something on my computer and I get an email or text on my phone, I can’t be bothered to pick it up, but I can quickly check to see what the message was.
So basically you have nothing to prove your theory of “nobody likes big chins” other than your opinion? Those polls tell you that people like front bezels with a fingerprint scanner, it tells you everything, most importantly it proves you wrong. You have nothing but opinion to counterpoint it. I offered actual physical data from consumers.
I never pick up my phone either. I double tap it and since it doesn’t do the full unlock I can see if it is actually an email I care about or something irrelevant, then I unlock. Damn, I’m trying to imagine how it would be if I had to unlock for every little thing, losing immense time in the meanwhike, it’s one of those things that Apple got *completely* wrong, and of course the good imitators overseas imitated even her bad ideas…
Like I told, you, I don’t have the funds to run the studies. But there are studies showing that the the bigger the phone is, the slower people are with it (I can link some if you will) as there are many reviews dissing the giant bezels (including the chin) of iPhone plus as compared to other 5.5 inches (again I can link if you will).
Online polls is/are hardly data. According to them Ron Paul would twice be president of the United States. They are silly really as they are exceptionally biased in their sampling.
Now you’re going off topic again by mentioning Apple and people being slower. Neither of those have anything to do with you’re original comment about big chins. I can prove that comment wrong with three words actually: i like them.
Personal beliefs are irrelevant. When I say people don’t like big chins I mean that they prefer ergonomy, not necessarily over other things but they do prefer ergonomy on its own. The studies showing that things get slower with extra large sizes basically show how less ergonomic a phone gets the bigger it gets, and giving it a double chin sure makes it bigger.
Heh good luck making out what my notficatons mean without actually unlocking my phone. They’re purposefully less detailed so that only I can understand their conteXT (what merit’s unlocking the phone and which doesn’t; guess what, half doesn’t, especially if I’m in a busy environment)
“When I say people don’t like big chins I mean that they prefer ergonomy,” Again you have nothing but your opinion to back this up. You like to offer your opinions as facts, you do that often.
At the end of the day you like picking up your phone to unlock it, I love being able to have it laying down.
Heh, you marketing people always think that opinion creates the world, whilSt the world merely is and all you do is understand its properties, you cannot dictate what a person likes, at best you can reveal it to him/her.
Ergonomy is one of those things, going back to paleolithic, you cannot choose to dislike ergonomy, you are programmed to like it, that is one of the basic differences between homo sapiens and the rest of the hominids. A greater sense for ergonomics which led to better stone tools which -in part- led to being the only surviving member of the hominids out of the last (lengthy) ice age.
People like ergonomy, because they do. Double chins go against it, so better they counteract the loss of ergonomy with something better. But they don’t do even that, thumb cannot reach there in bigger phones in mid-grip, which is why you see a lot of the people unlocking their phones with a second hand, even on ads.
So it’s actually bad in both function and form. One reason that I lament Jobs’ “departure” is that he would not allow such travesty, and the rest of the copycats would actually have good ideas to copy…
So once again you have nothing but your opinion? Go it.
Whatever you just babbled about, had nothing to do with your original point. You still have yet to offer up any proof of your original point that “nobody likes big chins”. Each one of your replies is some new ramble about lord knows what or you start talking about some other phone or company.
I did multiple times, you continuously sidestep them. Do you want me to actually give you papers showing people preferring ergonomy and how ergonomy goes down the bigger a phone is (big chins make a phone bigger you know).
What do you mean by proof? There is no “proof” in science, only studies. I’m not going to bust my a$$ trying to find those studies for you (many are behind paywalls) if you’re not to read them. Are you going to read them? If yes, I am going to lose about 30 minutes to find the papers for you, if not do your own research…
I want you to show me proof that “nobody cares about big chins” but you can’t because I already proved you wrong in the fact that I like them. Now if you said “some people don’t like them” that is another story.
OK, I was obviously exagerrating for effect. It’s still true that people are inconvenienced by it, even those that don’t know it, like you, and that’s because of our ingrained need for ergonomics (our hands are probably our most valuable external organ and they are incredible sensitive to even minor differences…)
It’s true that people like them, even those that don’t know it, like you.
The skin is our most important external organ, without it we wouldn’t function or survive.
Every creature has skin, few have (usable) hands…
There are studies showing that people prefer ergonomics, there are no studies showing that they prefer big chins…
Every creature does have skin, not all is the same. Without Skin our hands would be useless. Skin is what gives us our sense of touch.
We don’t need studies we have opinions of actual smartphone users who say they like it. It would be a waste of money to conduct a study like that because we already know the results there are people who like who big chins on phones. Stef doesn’t like them. That’s all this boils down to, it;s not about ergonomics or chins, its about you not being able to realize people have different views and opinions than you. You’re brain can’t fathom that people think differently than you and have a different ideal than yours.
“I never understood why/how having the fingertip sensor in the front is thought as ergonomically correct.It needs two hands (one to hold the phone and another to unlock)”
If I understand correctly you are missing a thumb so you can not assign it to unlock your phone. I am sorry man.
he is right that the finger print on the front is GENERALLY less ergonomic especially as the phone size increases, while the phone is in the air its harder to fall out of your hand if your hand is on a back fingerprint than on the front, your index finger will behave like a spine also it essentially makes the phone smaller since it doesnt need extra bezel like a home fingerprint, but home is more functional on a Table and it is also superior if your using your phone upright on a holder for navigation etc
Thumb does not reach down there on 5.5 phones unless you hold them too low. Also the chin remains as big as ever and you have to leave with it.
I hold all my phones low, never had any issues with it being unsafe and the thumb is in perfect position to unlock it.
With phones I have used that had rear fingerprint sensors, anything over 5 inches I am forced to stretch my finger unnaturally to unlock it.
Rear fingertip sensors can be in the middle of the phone’s back, no unnatural stretching (you have the whole back to place them). Front facing fingertip scanner has just one position, and it needs low grip which is the number 1 reason for broken screens.
I’m happy that you have not broken yours, but you’re a sample of 1… A good majority of the broken screens I’ve seen are caused by low grips, I always recommend people to hold their phone higher, it’s a far safer grip… I guess OEMs make more money with more broken phones, no wonder they push use cases where low grip is preferable.
Except they are not always put in the middle, so there is stretching on some phones. I never have to stretch with a front button it’s always in the same place which is where my thumb naturally rests to begin with. It is much more ergonomic for me.
You are also a sample of 1. You’re “majority” means very little because it can’t be proven true. I could say a majority of broken phones I have seen are from people stretching to reach the back fingerprint sensor and dropping it. But like your “majority” neither can be proven. We’ve had this discussion before the only thing that it boils down to is “Stef doesn’t like front finger buttons”. Nothing more, nothing less.
Just notice how people who get their phones broken alot hold them as contrasted to the people who don’t. Ever since I started noticing that it was a revelation for me. I’m sure that of I had the funds I would find a corelation between the two…
I notice people who get their phones broken hold them a variety of ways and usually the breaking has little to do with how they hold it.
Notice better from now on :p…. it makes sense too, holding anything away from its center of gravity is disastrous in the long run…
Depends on the item, a rifles center of gravity is usually somewhere on the barrel, good look holding it there when you shooting. Better wear thick gloves lol.
Rifles have their center of gravity moved when shooting, veeery different situation. Unless you shoot with your phones too (dunno, phones are getting exceedingly … smart lately :p)
Do you think that this phone is better choise than the mi5?
No way!
Really an amazing phone for a good price.
I’d rather see a Snapdragon 65x version like Redmi Note 3 Pro.
It would allow Quick Charge 3.0 and also opens the way for a Taiwan Special Edition with LTE B20 & B28 (800MHz & 700MHz, useful for Europe too)
http://en.miui.com/thread-299743-1-1.html
They could make a Mediatek version with both of those bands. In fact it would make more sense for Taiwan given that Mediatek is based in Taiwan.
Hi Balco, which version of the Redmi Pro you would suggest in terms of specs? I am asking this because I have read around that X20 has heating issue. Also some users says that Meizu Pro 6 with X25 is heating a lot in intense usage. That being said, I don’t know if those allegations are true or not.
No tech device (and I mean, NO one) does not heat up while in use, especially under heavy use… So, it has to be seen: actually my phone is at 39Β°C (seeing it through an app), but I’m not complaining since there are 40+Β°C outside right now
I have seen your comment below regarding the heating issue, thanks for the reply. Redmi Pro has sd card slot but the middle version with X25 and 64GB cost 30$ more than the basic model. Just wondering if X25 is really optimized compared to X20.
They are essentially the same chip, the X25 is just clocked slightly higher.
Neither of them are optimized, they are clocked insanely high.
Me too π
I was really hoping they release an SD variant, and now this.
Maybe I’ll just pull in a little more and get the Mi5 3gig version like someone suggested.
Maybe you could wait for sometime? (A month or two?) Xiaomi might release one, and you should be able to tell much earlier,(than 2 months) depending on the sales of this device.
I have read about heating issue with X20 and X25? Is that for real or it depends on the software? I am really interested to get the Redmi Pro but can’t decide which one to buy.
from what i read they do have heating issues, i saw the qiku n4s reaching 49 degrees even the apollo lite get hot but not too hot tho so i guess it depends on the individual phone’s optimization but maybe generalizing of it having heat issues isnt far off
Thanks, I think that some CPU are heating because the system/software isn’t exploiting the processor’s power well. I mean heavy system can cause heating. I really hope that Redmi Pro will not present that kind of problem.
I saw it too 49Β°degree it is insanely hot .mediatek processor are shit.it is always better to use qualcomm processors
49 isn’t overheating that is normal operating temperature. Most SD phones run even hotter than that. My Nextbit Robin with a SD808 is currently running at 47 and it’s just sitting on my desk. The SD820 can reach over 90 when pushed to it’s limit.
Depends on a lot of factors: software, build materials, other components used. After the disaster of the SD810/615 overheating is an issue that was never even thought of before. Most people mistake normal operating temperature with overheating because of that fiasco last year. They report overheating anytime the phone gets hot even when it’s normal. All phones will get hot under stress, it’s the nature of the product. The tests I have seen of various X20/25 phones has them in normal operating range.
also for people that think that the Snapdragon version is superior people complained about the idol 4s inr eviews that while the day 2 day performance is fine when recording videos it throttles down a lot..just like the sony phone….
so while i think that the 652 is great even it can get to its limits especially in such hot summer days
Exynos 8 Octa 8890 vs MTK6797 Helio X20 Deca Core”
”
Vernee Apollo Lite Multi-task Test: Fast and Smooth”
”
Apollo Lite CPU Real Time Status Demonstration”
see these videos below
Exynos 8 Octa 8890 vs MTK6797 Helio X20 Deca Core”
”
Vernee Apollo Lite Multi-task Test: Fast and Smooth”
”
Apollo Lite CPU Real Time Status Demonstration”
The plastic back is worse at dissipating heat and that’s a factor.
And,just in case, the SoC overheating and the back of the phone heating up are 2 very diff things. The back is about your comfort,nothing more. The SoC overheating is about throttling , in general they have diff limits. Lets say at 90C they start to throttle, at 100C they take more drastic measures and shut some cores off and at 110C the device turns off. That’s just a simplified example,there is more going on and the limits will differ from SoC to SoC and device to device. Haven’t found yet good info on how this thing throttles so can’t help with that.
If you are curious,in the device thermals section towards the bottom of the page you can see how a few diff phones with SD810 throttled in diff ways- don’t have a more recent link to illustrate the point http://www.anandtech.com/show/9878/the-huawei-mate-8-review/5
Edit: that doesn’t mean in any way that i condone throttling. if there is a ” turbo” mode where the SoC goes to speeds it can’t sustain for long ,it should be properly defined and explained.
oh i see, yeah i forgot this too is a reason why glass backs gets so hot
I’ll buy a MediaTek phone only if it can exceed an SD 820 based phone (i.e. a prime flagship) on every real-world as well as synthetic test, graphics included, by HUGE margins (as in enough to make it look like a two or three generation leap) while costing half the price.
Otherwise, like Vince McMahon says – “No chance”. π My fat money is reserved STRICTLY for QualComm or Samsung, meanwhile the nickels and dimes are always available for a cheap-ass MediaTek.
One weird thing about the Redmi Pro ,they don’t list wifi ac.If you plan to buy it and if wifi ac matters,better make sure it’s there.
hmm alright im kinda iffy because redmi cameras arent usually good
It is true that mediatek x20 and x25 are fast but they hit up and not freindly with battery.but just wait for a review the redmi seem good on paper
SD 808 isn’t a powerfull prossesor but let’s wait for a review
a short look at the cam, not easy to understand much with Google Translate but info is scarce for now http://news.mydrivers.com/1/493/493086_1.htm
this competes with the apollo lite and qiku n4s kinda hard o pick one XD, sensors is one thing but what is the lens architecture how many elements and are these elements glass or plastic and lastly the BIG daddy software what dem algorithms looking like, ziaomi’s histroy of cameras is subpar but lets see
360 n4s 5000mah ,16 mpx rear camera and cheaper
If I was picking between those 3 I would go with Xiaomi just because I trust the company more with future updates.
16mp camera means next to nothing without the rest of the camera specs and a full review. More MP’s doesn’t mean a better camera.
valid point and there maybe more reasons i doubt qiku will have a international rom so it google services gambling if it will work properly or not, one thing i realize too is if i get a vernee since i dont have that EURO type socket ill probably get a non quick charge charger just like what ahppened to me with my cubot h1… and the thing will take almost 8 HOURS!!!!! to fully charge without quick charge
I agree but mediatek chips are crap trust me .this phone is awesome only if it has snapdragon ship. But wait for a real review
“trust me”. Who are you exactly? And why would I “trust” you and not my own experience? I have used every one of the current Mediatek chips. The X20/25 is far from “crap”, it is an excellent all around chip.
ok, i will trust you even if i don’t know you but wait until review come!!
I never said to trust me. I just know from my own experience the X20 used in this phone is a good chip.
Love the specs, hate the overpriced product.
Just curious why you think it is overpriced?
i dont understand why people say its overpriced
Maybe because it costs almost like mi5 (at least the price that the resellers are asking for it right now)
Because it has a Mediatek chip I am guessing. Many people are still suck in 2012 when MTK produced cheap chips with terrible GPS and performance. I read comments all the time on other sites that are so misinformed and clueless. Many people only look at the SoC and then say X phone is too overpriced, they forget about the other dozen components.
i really believe its the SOC thing, ” why buy a mtk phone for 250″ etc it doenst matter if the phone has 64gb memory good camera etc etc its juts MTK phone must be cheap because we are just buying a chip
Spot on and same feelings here.
For a phone with that X25, I was expecting the price to be around US$ 159.99 and no more. However, at the mentioned prices, I might as well have gone for a Snapdragon based phone?
It seems MediaTek doesn’t have a price advantage anymore, or maybe it’s the phone manufacturers who have decided to overprice their phones? I dunno, but these prices for MediaTek phones is insane.
vs the 360 N4 and N4S? This one is two thirds more than the N4 for the base model. 899CNY vs 1499CNY. And you get less RAM and lower resolution screen. Same cam but this one has the depth of field gimmick that doesn’t work well from what i’ve seen in the Chinese press.
You also got the LeEco devices with X20 and X25 and even the Redmi Note 3 Pro 3GB at 1099CNY can be considered a competitor. At least you don’t get the pseudo-1080p display with that one.
In China the expectations were for a lower price too. When they announced pricing people got stuck for a bit instead of the usual cheers.
maybe after the hype dies down the pricing between the two will stabilize
i might just go for the n4s
360 might also have the Q4 or Q5 Lite soon.That might be with SD652 and dual cam. We’ll see.
ZUK Z2 Rio is at 1499CNY too with 5inch 1080p LCD and SD820.
If you go higher, Huawei, LeEco got interesting things,better value than MI5.
Whatever floats your boat. This Redmi Pro is not terrible value but not Xaiomi value either.
lol everytime i end up confused maybe i should wait till the end of the year XD
What do you care about? CPU,GPU,cam,VR?
Kirin 950 is the best in CPU,SD820 in GPU for the most part but you can do with less at 1080p, X20 is flagship like CPU perf and good enough GPU for1080p at good value.
If you don’t care about perf you go with A53x8 for good battery. -P10 or better like Kirin 650 or SD625.
If you want VR,better wait for Daydream compatible devices. ZTE claims the Axon 7 will support Daydream,the only such device so far.
For the cam,that’s hard,you can find some China flagships here
but few others do decent camera reviews,not easy to find reliable info.
Edit:forgot about the Xiaomi Max in the value comparison.That one starts at 1499CNY too.
Dear friend, past with expensive phone (280 dollars) I to download MediaTek Uncle Tools for GPS and tried everything not still work. Sometime their EPO file server not reachable, so no way to update EPO. π So GPS problems is true. Performance was ok.
Sorry for bad english.
What phone did you have? Mediatek used to have terrible GPS but all their current products are fine.
good gaming performance, alright camera in artificial lighting and daylight, and a big battery if it doesnt have a big battery then ok sized battey with nice quick charge on a budget 270 max
What was the phone? Does the gps works at all?
They still produce bad SoC’s regarding your user experience & their is no much difference in pricing per gate compared to QC.
Tought you don’t like horrible pen tile based AMOLEDS & gimmick rather bad dual camera’s?
All do they are the reason why it costs more, personally I do like AMOLEDS…
I have no issue with AMOLED’s…. That is realjjj you are thinking. I prefer LCD but I don’t have an issue with AMOLED.
take a look at zuk z2 Rio with SD820, MTK X20 and the redmi pro is not in the same category but cost the same $225. Why? for one extra 5MP camera buyers should pay extra $$$ as the phone is unique, it is not.
Because you are only looking at one component, the CPU. A lot more goes into the price of a phone than just the CPU. The Redmi Pro has a bigger battery, better camera, Micro SD support and it comes from a better brand. Zuk is good but they don’t have the reputation that Xiaomi does. Both phones are good value for the money, but they each offer something different. The Zuk is better for hardcore gamers, the Redmi Pro is better for people who value the camera.
Instead for z2 you’ll pay for smaller battery, no microsd, cheap build quality, weak camera and screen… There are still chances redmi pro to be even worse than this, we’ll have to see when the sw will be on point in actual reviews, but for now that’s what we know about z2, and it doesn’t seems like the best deal in the world even with that soc at that price
I never understood why/how having the fingertip sensor in the front is thought as ergonomically correct. It needs two hands (one to hold the phone and another to unlock) + it makes the profile bigger by making the “chin” of the phone unnecessarily bigger.
To me it’s clearly the wrong position, chosen in the sorry attempt to imitate Apple without thinking that Apple actually had a good reason to put the sensor there (it already doubles as their home button).
Google tried to make phones simpler by removing dedicating keys, and now we see their return for silly reasons, that I don’t get. Especially ergonomically speaking it’s the worse route. What’s good for the small iPhone does not translate well to the big androids…
I sit at my desk with my phone facing me, reach over with one thumb I can unlock it and see who texted, called or emailed me. All while still typing on my computer or talking on the phone. With the back sensor it always requires you to pick up the phone. Now do you understand?
“I never understood why/how having the fingertip sensor in the front is thought as ergonomically correct.It needs two hands (one to hold the phone and another to unlock)”
If I understand correctly you are missing a thumb, so you can not assign it to unlock your phone with the same hand you are holding it. I am sorry man.
on smaller like 5-5,3″ atleast for me it is now issue to reach the button with a finger with jsut one hand..like thats the point o.o if i couldnt reach the bottom anyway with a hand it would feel wierd to me…actually even on my le max 2 with 5,7″ i can reach the bottom mid easily with one hand and my thumb
he is right that the finger print on the front is GENERALLY less ergonomic especially as the phone size increases, while the phone is in the air its harder to fall out of your hand if your hand is on a back fingerprint than on the front, your index finger will behave like a spine also it essentially makes the phone smaller since it doesnt need extra bezel like a home fingerprint, but home is more functional on a Table and it is also superior if your using your phone upright on a holder for navigation etc
Thumb does not reach down there on 5.5 phones unless you hold them too low (unsafe grip). Also the chin remains as big as ever and you have to live with it…
Apple won by forcing their inferior ideas to the rest. Jobs era Apple had good ideas, so it made sense to imitate them. Cook’s era Apple is a disaster, no wonder they are falling in YoY sales pretty much everywhere. Less and less people want to be associated with that company, yet Chinese vendors do … oh well.
Or you know double tap the screen and do the same thing, by glancing the lock screen.
Like I said, unergonomic position employed by some in a sorry attempt to imitate Apple. Now all phones finally achived the kind of chins that Apple has on their phones, Apple won, not by making ergonomical their phone, but by making everybody else’s less ergonomical.
Double tap doesnt work when my phone is locked with a fingerprint.
What this really comes down to is Stef doesn’t like front buttons. Everything else you said was pure nonsense.
I hold all my phones low, never had any issues with it being unsafe and the thumb is in perfect position to unlock it.
With phones I have used that had rear fingerprint sensors, anything over 5 inches I am forced to stretch my finger unnaturally to unlock it.
Heh, unlocking your phone for quick glances is nonsense. That is what lock screens are for. Eliminating the locks screen is the kind of nonsense that new Apple pulls.
Like I said, look at their sales , there is not a single category of theirs that does well compared to last year. Apple TV is toast, Apple watch, don’t ever talk about that, iPad have losing sales for years by now, iPhones just posted a 2nd fail quarter in a row.
If this is where you get your ideas good luck. Nobody likes big chins , it makes phones more uncomfortable to use, that is the point of ergonomics, finding common ground on what is comfortable or not. Ben Affleck chins are hugely uncomfortable.
Rear fingertip sensors can be in the middle of the phone’s back, no unnatural stretching (you have the whole back to place them). Front facing fingertip scanner has just one position, and it needs low grip which is the number 1 reason for broken screens.
I’m happy that you have not broken yours, but you’re a sample of 1… A good majority of the broken screens I’ve seen are caused by low grips, I always recommend people to hold their phone higher, it’s a far safer grip… I guess OEMs make more money with more broken phones, no wonder they push use cases where low grip is preferable.
Except they are not always put in the middle, so there is stretching on some phones. I never have to stretch with a front button it’s always in the same place which is where my thumb naturally rests to begin with. It is much more ergonomic for me.
You are also a sample of 1. You’re “majority” means very little because it can’t be proven true. I could say a majority of broken phones I have seen are from people stretching to reach the back fingerprint sensor and dropping it. But like your “majority” neither can be proven. We’ve had this discussion before the only thing that it boils down to is “Stef doesn’t like front finger buttons”. Nothing more, nothing less.
“Unlocking for quick glances is nonsense”. Maybe for you it is, for anyone who uses their phone for business it is far from “nonsense”, it is a necessity.
This argument has nothing to do with Apple or their Sales.
“Nobody likes big chins”. Do you have anything to back that up other than your opinion? I have evidence that suggests otherwise. All of them following sites did polls about fingerprint location and here are the % of those who prefer front:
Android Authority – 37%
Droid Life – 30%
Pocket Now – 60%
Phone Arena – 40% (tied with side for first)
I guess you missed all these polls, it seems a lot of people do like them. Once again you think your opinion speaks for everyone.
Just notice how people who get their phones broken alot hold them as contrasted to the people who don’t. Ever since I started noticing that it was a revelation for me. I’m sure that of I had the funds I would find a corelation between the two…
I notice people who get their phones broken hold them a variety of ways and usually the breaking has little to do with how they hold it.
I’m using my phone for business, I can’t be bothered with a full unlock, it takes way too much of my precious time. Instead I glance the lockscreen like a normal human being and then unlock if necessary…
Hehe, online polls. Like I said “nobody likes big chins”, it has nothing to do with what looks good, it has to do with how easily one can store/use a phone. Big bezeled phones like iPhone plus take a thumbs down , almost universally, for their bad ergonomics. Good luck in proving that a giant chin is good for ergonomics.
People may prefer the FF fingertip because they are accustomed to the look, that tells me nothing, it is still a bad idea.
When I am in a meeting, on the phone, typing something on my computer and I get an email or text on my phone, I can’t be bothered to pick it up, but I can quickly check to see what the message was.
So basically you have nothing to prove your theory of “nobody likes big chins” other than your opinion? Those polls tell you that people like front bezels with a fingerprint scanner, it tells you everything, most importantly it proves you wrong. You have nothing but opinion to counterpoint it. I offered actual physical data from consumers.
Notice better from now on :p…. it makes sense too, holding anything away from its center of gravity is disastrous in the long run…
I never pick up my phone either. I double tap it and since it doesn’t do the full unlock I can see if it is actually an email I care about or something irrelevant, then I unlock. Damn, I’m trying to imagine how it would be if I had to unlock for every little thing, losing immense time in the meanwhike, it’s one of those things that Apple got *completely* wrong, and of course the good imitators overseas imitated even her bad ideas…
Like I told, you, I don’t have the funds to run the studies. But there are studies showing that the the bigger the phone is, the slower people are with it (I can link some if you will) as there are many reviews dissing the giant bezels (including the chin) of iPhone plus as compared to other 5.5 inches (again I can link if you will).
Online polls is/are hardly data. According to them Ron Paul would twice be president of the United States. They are silly really as they are exceptionally biased in their sampling.
Double tap wouldn’t work for me because my notifications are set to be private. All I can see with double tapping is the type of notification, I have to actually unlock the phone to see what the message is. And I won’t change that because I value my privacy.
Now you’re going off topic again by mentioning Apple and people being slower. Neither of those have anything to do with you’re original comment about big chins. I can prove that comment wrong with three words actually: i like them.
Depends on the item, a rifles center of gravity is usually somewhere on the barrel, good look holding it there when you shooting. Better wear thick gloves lol.
Personal beliefs are irrelevant. When I say people don’t like big chins I mean that they prefer ergonomy, not necessarily over other things but they do prefer ergonomy on its own. The studies showing that things get slower with extra large sizes basically show how less ergonomic a phone gets the bigger it gets, and giving it a double chin sure makes it bigger.
Heh good luck making out what my notficatons mean without actually unlocking my phone. They’re purposefully less detailed so that only I can understand their conteXT (what merit’s unlocking the phone and which doesn’t; guess what, half doesn’t, especially if I’m in a busy environment)
Rifles have their center of gravity moved when shooting, veeery different situation. Unless you shoot with your phones too (dunno, phones are getting exceedingly … smart lately :p)
“When I say people don’t like big chins I mean that they prefer ergonomy,” Again you have nothing but your opinion to back this up. You like to offer your opinions as facts, you do that often.
At the end of the day you like picking up your phone to unlock it, I love being able to have it laying down.
Heh, you marketing people always think that opinion creates the world, whilSt the world merely is and all you do is understand its properties, you cannot dictate what a person likes, at best you can reveal it to him/her.
Ergonomy is one of those things, going back to paleolithic, you cannot choose to dislike ergonomy, you are programmed to like it, that is one of the basic differences between homo sapiens and the rest of the hominids. A greater sense for ergonomics which led to better stone tools which -in part- led to being the only surviving member of the hominids out of the last (lengthy) ice age.
People like ergonomy, because they do. Double chins go against it, so better they counteract the loss of ergonomy with something better. But they don’t do even that, thumb cannot reach there in bigger phones in mid-grip, which is why you see a lot of the people unlocking their phones with a second hand, even on ads.
So it’s actually bad in both function and form. One reason that I lament Jobs’ “departure” is that he would not allow such travesty, and the rest of the copycats would actually have good ideas to copy…
So once again you have nothing but your opinion? Go it.
Whatever you just babbled about, had nothing to do with your original point. You still have yet to offer up any proof of your original point that “nobody likes big chins”. Each one of your replies is some new ramble about lord knows what or you start talking about some other phone or company.
I did multiple times, you continuously sidestep them. Do you want me to actually give you papers showing people preferring ergonomy and how ergonomy goes down the bigger a phone is (big chins make a phone bigger you know).
What do you mean by proof? There is no “proof” in science, only studies. I’m not going to bust my a$$ trying to find those studies for you (many are behind paywalls) if you’re not to read them. Are you going to read them? If yes, I am going to lose about 30 minutes to find the papers for you, if not do your own research…
I want you to show me proof that “nobody cares about big chins” but you can’t because I already proved you wrong in the fact that I like them. Now if you said “some people don’t like them” that is another story.
OK, I was obviously exagerrating for effect. It’s still true that people are inconvenienced by it, even those that don’t know it, like you, and that’s because of our ingrained need for ergonomics (our hands are probably our most valuable external organ and they are incredible sensitive to even minor differences…)
It’s true that people like them, even those that don’t know it, like you.
The skin is our most important external organ, without it we wouldn’t function or survive.
Every creature has skin, few have (usable) hands…
There are studies showing that people prefer ergonomics, there are no studies showing that they prefer big chins…
Every creature does have skin, not all is the same. Without Skin our hands would be useless. Skin is what gives us our sense of touch.
We don’t need studies we have opinions of actual smartphone users who say they like it. It would be a waste of money to conduct a study like that because we already know the results there are people who like who big chins on phones. Stef doesn’t like them. That’s all this boils down to, it;s not about ergonomics or chins, its about you not being able to realize people have different views and opinions than you. You’re brain can’t fathom that people think differently than you and have a different ideal than yours.
Really an amazing phone for a good price.
I’d rather see a Snapdragon 65x version like Redmi Note 3 Pro.
It would allow Quick Charge 3.0 and also opens the way for a Taiwan Special Edition with LTE B20 & B28 (800MHz & 700MHz, useful for Europe too)
http://en.miui.com/thread-299743-1-1.html
They could make a Mediatek version with both of those bands. In fact it would make more sense for Taiwan given that Mediatek is based in Taiwan.
Hi Balco, which version of the Redmi Pro you would suggest in terms of specs? I am asking this because I have read around that X20 has heating issue. Also some users says that Meizu Pro 6 with X25 is heating a lot in intense usage. That being said, I don’t know if those allegations are true or not.
I have seen your comment below regarding the heating issue, thanks for the reply. Redmi Pro has sd card slot but the middle version with X25 and 64GB cost 30$ more than the basic model. Just wondering if X25 is really optimized compared to X20.
No tech device (and I mean, NO one) does not heat up while in use, especially under heavy use… So, it has to be seen: actually my phone is at 39Β°C (seeing it through an app), but I’m not complaining since there are 40+Β°C outside right now
They are essentially the same chip, the X25 is just clocked slightly higher.
Me too π
I was really hoping they release an SD variant, and now this.
Maybe I’ll just pull in a little more and get the Mi5 3gig version like someone suggested.
Maybe you could wait for sometime? (A month or two?) Xiaomi might release one, and you should be able to tell much earlier,(than 2 months) depending on the sales of this device.
Neither of them are optimized, they are clocked insanely high.
What no Snapdragon in a PRO model?
Was really, really looking forward to this having an SD edition.
Will have to look elsewhere now or wait for a slightly less expensive 820 phone. π
The Snapdragon 820 based Mi5 costs only a tad bit more, while having vastly superior graphics and better all round processing capability (real world multitasking, synthetics etc.).
Unless someone is really, really hard pressed in the 1999 CNY price bracket, I don’t see a compelling reason why one wouldn’t spend a bit more for a much superior product.
I say this because going by your requirement, I don’t think the Mi5 3GB model is that far above the Redmi Note Pro price?
a little more?????? the mi 5 standard is going for 310 to 350, from resellers thats around roughly 70(with mark up) to 130(Price without mark up) extra versus the redmi pro and as usual people are not buying an SOC only but an entire phone they may prefer an amoled screen, larger battery, better build material, Larger screen, micro sd card support and maybe even dual cameras(if implemented well) i fail to see mi 5 being “much superior”
Don’t get your panties in a bunch and your menstruation pad all soaked. Here are some facts for you:
– This Note Pro X25 4GB costs $300 as marked by Xiaomi
– When listed online, prices will be higher
– The MI5 is already available for $310 – $340 (incl. markup)
– One Mi5 is here: http://bit.ly/2aDc2gi (314 orders)
So as I said:
– The price isn’t just trivial, but also in favor of the Mi5 / SD820
– The difference in the two SoCs is vast, the 820 is far better
– The other differences you listed doesn’t make up for this
One may prefer an OLED / AMOLED display, but it doesn’t have any significant impact on day to day operation, otherwise the marked for LCD based phones wouldn’t have dominated for so long.
Build material? Are you joking? Have you even handled the Mi5? Same company, flagship grade build, beautiful finish.
To see why the Mi5 is superior, you’d have to have one like I do. Try it out if you can before hypothesizing.
My dad uses the Redmi Note 3 (SD 650 model), so going by that phone, it’s not too hard to extrapolate what the RN3 PRO will be like. No, it will not be graphene-enforced and the battery will not last till eternity. Marginal improvements of auxiliary features can never make up for a critical deficiency in an SoC, sorry.
OMG @ that price! I though it was going for some 370-380?
Is AliExpress reliable? I’ve never ordered from there before and am tempted! CallIt… Please respond!
Safe as long as you choose a reliable seller with a high reputation, and a large number of items sold (I mean the exact same item you are looking at), and you select DHL / UPS for shipping (costs around 20-25 bucks extra).
That link I posted: 314 orders, 225 feedback @ 4.6 rating, looks great. Don’t hold me at gun point later though. However, not to scare you or anything, yes, it’s completely safe.
ORDERED! (From a different seller though).
I’m nervous since this is my first time from AliExpress, but I checked the feedback and all. Excited to have an 820 phone π
Fastcardtech and geekbuying have the mi5 3/32 version listed for $316 including shipping
Thanks for letting me now, but I’ve just ordered from AliExpress for almost the same price π
ill continue to be objective, the reasoning behind the mi 5 having some build quality issues is because it uses glass by default making it more susceptible to breaking than the alloy in the redmi pro
as for amoled i am not making a general statement for the technologies but a comparison between the individual phones, people also buy phones for form and in the eyes of the consumer preference is important regardless of critical function i was attemtping to show you an exclusive feature that the mi5 cannot offer
continuing on that note the redmi pro has a larger screen, micro SD slot larger battery and dual cameras all reasonable reasons to pay less to get as for the SOC the x20 and 25 are strong enough to handle graphically intensive games etc being able to run 60 fps games at 42-45 and 30 at around 25
the 820’s general performance isnt twice better or leagues ahead the average consumer will see no difference
i still fail to see the mi 5 being “much superior”
Are you really going to continue arguing for the sake of it?
1. I own an Mi5 – zero build quality issues – it is phenomenal. So what are you talking about? Can you show some YouTube videos where reviewers point out the “build issues”? Or is this once again “up in the air” hypothesizing? More susceptible to breaking? Then one should only buy Aluminium chassis phones, that’s your argument? Sure, just Google bendgate.
2. Consumers don’t give a crap about display technologies, unless the consumer happens to be an expert in the comments section of GizChina. π So going by that, the fact that the Mi5 doesn’t offer an OLED display doesn’t doesn’t really mean anything to the average consumer, who’ll probably think – if it looks good and feels good, who cares? They’ll probably not even ask to be honest.
3. Larger screen by how much? 0.35 inches? I’m guessing you can argue the other way as well? That the folks who prefer a smaller form factor will like it?
I never claimed that the 820’s performance is twice as better as the X25’s, but let’s compare the two devices here, as you also said, it’s about phones, not SoCs.
– One can buy a Mi5 right now for ~$310 (all inclusive)
– One can wait a bit and buy this RN3P-X25 for ~320 / ~330
– If the price of the RN3P-X25 is marked higher than the Mi5 by retailers, it’s a really, really shitty deal.
I will stand by this argument, and I hope prospective phone buyers won’t be stupid enough to worry about “a beautiful glass body”, “a superb display” and a “beastly cpu + gpu bar none” that they can get for cheaper than the RN3P-X25 with X% performance of this and that with an OLED display and a card slot. No way.
no hypothesizing here if i break the glass on a mi 5 the body is gone, if i bend a metal body i maybe still be able to bend it back in place
my argument is not that one should only buy metal chasis phones my argument is that there are features that the redmi pro has that the mi 5 lacks and you pay less at the same time
“Unless someone is really, really hard pressed in the 1999 CNY price bracket, I don’t see a compelling reason why one wouldn’t spend a bit more for a much superior product”
the features i showed maybe be compelling to others ill repeat them a micro sd slot, larger battey, Oled screen,dual cameras, 64 gb storage(redmi pro mid version), larger screen. i still fail to see the mi 5 being “a much superior product”
You don’t pay less. Quit misinforming people. The price from Xiaomi for the top end model is at CNY 1999, roughly US$ 302.
When listed, assuming a reasonable margin, the price will be around US $330.
Very shitty deal compared to the lower priced better spec’d Mi5, as I have maintained throughout.
Wrong, because for the flagship phone: X25 / 4GB etc. the listed price will be marked EVEN HIGHER, around $350-360.
I’m expecting it to start at $350 – which, for a MediaTek phone, is basically impending doom.
“impending doom”. Based on what? You do realize a phone is made up of about a dozen other components besides the SoC? All of them affect the price…
We’ll see Balco. Knowing how much you defend MediaTek while claiming no allegiance or bias, your reply is sort of expected.
But time will tell, and I hope you’re already aware of Xiaomi’s own figures of how many MTK vs QC devices they sell. The problem is, we’ll all forget this all too soon. This comment thread will become defunct, and 6 months down the line when Xiaomi will stop manufacturing this model due to piss poor sales, none of us will be willing to follow up and grill anyone who said otherwise.
So let’s just hold our horses for now, and wait for the next 6 months.
I defend all SoC’s, I don’t have a favorite. I just can’t stand the comments that say “X phone will be bad or overpriced because it has X SoC”. The SoC isn’t even the most expensive component in a phone, the display is. There have been terrible Mediatek SoC’s in the past, but there also have been terrible Qualcomm SoC’s. There have also been excellent SoC’s from both companies. And there is the Samsung Exnyos which is probably the best all around SoC.
but i was talking about the low and mid version which are cheaper with mark up
http://www.geekbuying.com/item/Xiaomi-Redmi-Pro-5-5inch-OLED-3GB-64GB-Smartphone—Gray-370473.html
http://www.geekbuying.com/item/Xiaomi-Redmi-Pro-5-5inch-OLED-3GB-32GB-Smartphone—Gray-370485.html
a very good deal seeing it has features the mi 5 cannot offer for less
To be fair, many of the reviews I’ve seen about mi5 pointed out build quality issues, like the one on gizchina. it (that’s one I remember for sure).
No way… Xiaomi makes just flawless products… Ask anyine on gizchina…
https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/fb4d98791af640797a712d2e861197823dea469dcd5273d1dad7c36d58b4ee15.jpg
Just about every review of the Mi5 points out build quality issues…
And you’re confusing phones this is the Redmi Pro. The RN3P is a completely different phone.
It can still come later, just kike with the Note 3. They may be waiting on a newer version of the Snap 65x series so that it is an actual upgrade of the Note 3, also in hardware.
But for sale in india they need a Snapdragon as MediaTeks are forbidden there, so if they want to sell it there, they will.
Mediatek isn’t forbidden in India, Xiaomi is forbidden from selling MTK phones there. Several companies in India sell MTK phones.
They have the Note 3 Pro and the Max with SD65x.
I’ve just ordered the Mi5 3GB for less than $320 π (post below). No way I’d spend that kind of money on a MediaTek based phone, sorry.
I buy phones based on the entire package not just the SoC.
That’s you and your decision, not me.
I care a lot about the SoC and have major reservations about paying big money for MediaTek phones (never will), so?
He is payed to write that… So on your personal opinion, he wrote you are wrong, as someone ask him. And he’ll get his new MTK phone, and a sandwich.
With a $5 coupon and a bunch of food stamps for the family to go along with, ha ha. Amazing how much he defends MediaTek phones and will persuade anyone to “know better”.
I correct people that are mistaken, I have no allegiance to a SoC company. I currently use two Qualcomm phones. I have also used Kirin and Exnyos phones. There are good Mediatek SoC’s and crap ones, there are good Qualcomm chips and crap ones.
Funny thing is some of my favorite phones of all time had Qualcomm SoC’s, like Xiaomi Mi4 and Mi3, anyone who is a regular here can attest to that.
It is clear that @KittyPride is clearly not enjoying your unnecessary, uncalled for corrections, and yet you persist in spite of it being mentioned, claiming “it is fun getting you all riled up, you Qualcomm fanboys are so easy to mess with”. Are you really an adult?
What got you so engaged and worked up in the first place? That he/she was persuaded to buy a QC phone at a good price and you couldn’t persuade her otherwise? Or the fact that he/she chose not to argue with you (this is the likely one) and ignored your opinion.
That’s reason for you to constantly subtly insult someone again, and again, on the correctness of their purchasing decisions?
Quit trolling people and get a life, seriously.
Here’s really just doing this for fun. You guys are easy to troll, you know?
yeah mod, add fuel to the fire xD
Wow, the honest admittance does reflect so nicely on you, you know. Somehow balco trolling others who have tried not to converse with him is ok, and going by the sound of what you just posted, you too enjoy it when it’s him attacking and making others miserable, right? Easy to troll? why, because they have a different opinion than yours, or different priorities which doesn’t match yours?
Classy. On with the name calling now, but I’m out.
Are you really an adult? Quit trolling me and get a life, seriously.
You avoided the real question though – on why you engage with people and mock their decisions while having “fun”, even when they don’t want to argue with you?
You avoided the real question though – why are you trying to be all “noble” while essentially doing the same thing with me?
Read what @Nolan said up top, the part about not responding. Sensible advice.
“I have no allegiance to a SoC company. I currently use two Qualcomm phones”
This proves only that, despise the fact you work for MTK, you secretly know deep inside yourself that MTK suck ballz and QC is the way to go ! xD
Actually if I had my choice I would choose Exnyos over all of them but they come in so few phones and I don’t like Samsung phones.
I bet you had a Meizu Pro 5 !
BTW this thread should be renamed “10 things you need to know about balco”
Nope I have only owned one Meizu phone it was an MX5. Before that I had a Xiaomi Mi4.
Don’t know whether he’s paid or not, but certainly is opinionated and engages as such, unnecessarily.
I mean, here I am, having spoken to another user who pointed me to a phone I was looking at for a while, on AliExpress, and I happily place an order at a superb price. So it’s a done deal, but no, let’s prove people wrong and engage in banter.
So here he is, commenting on my buying decision, on what he’d base his decision on, and the slight jab with what “most reasonable” people would do – which is go for a MediaTek device, masqueraded more politely as “look at the overall phone instead of the SoC”. Well, I choose not to, so fuck off and mind your own business maybe? Yes, I thought so.
Could very well be paid like you said, but I’ll still leave some benefit of doubt. Trolls like these are rarely taken seriously by any company, much less one that works at the scale of Xiaomi, MediaTek whatever.
Most reasonable people would go for the best value for the money. A fanboy such as yourself buys phones based only on the SoC, reasonable people buy phones based on the entire package.
“Trolls like these” Considering I have been given free phones to both test out and keep by several companies, I don’t fit your definition of a troll. But it is fun getting you all riled up, you Qualcomm fanboys are so easy to mess with.
Not paid to write anything my comments are 100% original but my status in the Chinese community has got me free phones in the past. And both my current phones use a SD chip so nice try, but I will take that Sandwich!
So you buy a phone just for the SoC? Hypothetical scenario. You have $300 to spend on a phone and must decide between one of these two:
A. Helio X25, 4GB RAM, 128GB Rom, Sony IMX 260 (same as used in S7) with f/1.7 aperture, hifi audio chip, 4000mAh.
B. SD615, 3GB RAM, 16GB Rom, Sony IMX 220 with f/2.2 aperture, 3000mAh.
By your logic you would choose the worse overall phone (B) just because it has a Qualcomm SoC. Even though that particular SoC is one of the worst ones Qualcomm ever made. Me and most reasonable people look at the entire package of the phone, not just the SoC.
Did you even read things properly? I ordered the Mi5, and that’s an SD 820 fitted phone, not an SD 615 phone. Your B. item would have to be an SD 820 phone, and yes, I’d choose that one blindfolded every time, irrespective of what the MediaTek based A. phone would offer.
And by the way, if you want to pitch two price comparable phones together as a side by side, the Mi5 vs Redmi Pro would be an apt comparison (X25 vs 820 in terms of chipsets), given that the Mi5 costs lesser (~315 ish) now.
I, or anyone else for that matter, surely don’t have to reasonable for “your” terms. I won’t use a MediaTek phone if I’m offered one for free.
Did you read things properly it wasn’t about what you ordered, it was a hypothetical scenario. So you would chose the Sd820 phone with the terrible specs just because it has a SD820. That is fanboy status!
The Mi5 is a good phone, but it doesn’t cost less. For the same spec’d version (3/32) the Redmi Pro costs $225, the Mi5 costs $300.
Yeah, resorting to calling someone a fanboy because they disagree with you or have different priorities while making a purchase, butting into conversations where your opinion wasn’t even needed in the first place (it was me and realjjj) but you felt compelled to, and generally being a dick to anyone that you have the slightest disagreement with.
I didn’t even want to argue with you any further, and if you look up, I tried to not even have a conversation with you when I said your decision is yours and not mine.
So why the fuck are you arguing and still carrying the conversation on? Why do you care a rat’s ass how people make their purchasing decisions, as irrational as they seem to you.
Unless of course, as Bojan pointed out, you’re paid to do this? I’m off this conversation. I’m not even sure why I chose to engage with a third grade troll like you on my first few comments at GizChina, some of which involved making a happy purchase where things should have ended.
Fucking useless jerk.
He has been doing this for a long time.
He has disagreements with pretty much everyone, on almost everything (except MaxPower and Yasir, for obvious reasons).
Even when it comes down to personal choices (like yours), he will still have a go at it, often trying to impose his standards as correct, dictating what constitutes rational thinking, what should be and what should not be, and how consumers should act. Just like he termed you a “fanboy” for prioritizing an SD 820 chipset based phone over whatever the other was.
My advice: Don’t respond to a single comment on his in the future (if you’re still around). He’ll still rain piss on the comments threads, attacking you, displaying passive aggression for various kinds, name calling, but you just have to ignore things and scroll past it.
“He has disagreements with pretty much everyone, on almost everything (except MaxPower and Yasir, for obvious reasons).”
What are those obvious reasons, if I may ask?
What are these obvious reasons, pray tell?
Swearing and name calling and you call someone else a “third grade troll”. I use the fanboy comment when it applies. Saying you would choose a worse phone just because it has a certain SoC, when every other component is worse is full fanboy.
It’s okay to be a fanboy where all fanboys of something, I am a fanboy of Xiaomi, you are a fanboy of Qualcomm. Much easier to just admit it.
Vivid colors lol
That’s how TVs were marketed in the 90’s. Vivid is marketing for oversaturated, it’s something you want to avoid.
What you get with Pentile is fraud, it simply isn’t 1080p.There are no marketing standards for how to define a pixel and they shamelessly abuse that. At least we have marketing standards for bananas…
You also get low brightness with OLED unless there is an overdrive mode (see the OnePlus 3 or the Meizu Pro 6) and contrast is only higher in theory, just because it is OLED it doesn’t mean the contrast is high.
A far as i know, they source the display from 2 China display makers and remains to be seen if they’ve managed to get quality to reasonable levels.
This was confirmed on Weibo as well, but the content was quickly taken down after a heated exchange between the groups there (one of whom was representing the second display maker).
Anyway, just get ready for flak – coz you know, MediaTek is the best there is and anyone who says otherwise on GizChina…… well π
Mediatek isn’t the best but it’s not crap like most people make it out to be. On this site there is no consensus on what chip is best. Some say SD, some say Mediatek others say Exnyos.
Well, this year it’s easy… SD820 don’t even have competitors… Then Exinos and few steps back Kirin and X20/25,followed by a little with SD65* (witch is even better solution for international markets, plus it’s more open to XDA).
On the CPU side Kirin is better in both perf and efficiency at load. SD820 with all 4 cores fully loaded goes to about 6W (ideally you want to stay bellow 3.5W) so devices in general can sustain that load for 20-30 seconds.Then they would drop to about 1.5GHz for the higher clocked cores and 1.2-1.3 GHz for the other 2 cores and that might last for 1.5mins before it has to drop further.Ofc power management will differ from device to device,some like the Zuk Z2 Pro seem to throttle a lot harder.
The Mate 8 can keep all 4 big cores fully loaded for1.5 mins and all cores are at 2.3GHz not 2+2 like SD820.It’s a much more honest offering.
Adreno goes to town against Mali though
For the most part but it can also throttle hard in some games and let Kirin almost catch up. It would be preferable if they would clock it at 400-500MHz but they push it a bit too far to win in benchmarks. The thing is that those don’t really matter. What a user needs is a certain FPS in actual games at on-screen resolution.
In PC you don’t need the new Titan X at 1.2K$ if you have a 1080p screen. In phones, because nobody is testing the GPUs in actual games, people still aim for “the best”
Anyway, Adreno is fast and likely they have an area advantage too , at least vs the current gen Mali, we’ll see how the G71 does next year.
The SD820 has the best GPU but the Exnyos 8890 is the best overall chip, the Kirin 955 an Helio X25 aren’t too far behind. A SoC is made up of a lot more than just a GPU and that’s all most people look at, even if they don’t play the most demanding games that can take advantage of that GPU.
Newer generation Oled panel doesn’t have colour accuracy issue. Samsung super amoled panel now are highly colour accurate as modern led ips panel or even more. Brightness is also high on those panel, maybe not as high as led panel. Pentile matrix panel are a huge issue since they halves the ppi it usually has. Xiaomi must have used cheap Chinese Oled panel, Those Oled panel doesn’t have the true zero blacks and because of that contrast are lower but still higher than normal led IPS panel. I think vivo and meizu must have used same chinese panels on their phones. And Oled do have infinite contrast do to their near zero black level. Display calibrators do have one of those contrast detector machine that reads the ANSI contrast ratio and usually Oleds are unmeasurable.You can read about Oled panel on displaymate.com they have written a good article about Oled.
I never said they have color accuracy issues,the article was saying “vivid colors” and found that funny. Some device makers do aim for vivid colors instead of accuracy though.Like OP3 before the update.But again,i never said that OLED has poor color accuracy, was just amused by the marketing term used here.
Brightness is only high if they have a boost mode for outdoors and not everybody has that. Andi I was pretty clear about that. yes Samsung goes to above 550nits but many others have low brightness and this one is listed at 350nits.It’s fine for indoors and nothing unusual for mid range but it is low compared to the best screens.
Contrast is higher on paper. It is higher for the best ones but many are only matching the best LCDs.So at about 3.5k while good ones go to 4.5k.
Most people have the wrong image about OLED.They think they are better but they don’t know what Pentile is and these kind of claims about contrast and blacks are being spread without any realism.
On paper OLED has some advantages but also has some disadvantages but one must remember that not all quality grades are created equal.Pentile is the big thing that ruins it and makes it fraud.- to be fair we are not 100% certain this one is Pentile but it’s 99% safe to assume it is.
Most users think that OLED is better even when it isn’t. RGB OLED with reasonable power consumption would be nice but nobody is offering that anymore in phones.
This matters today a lot more than yesterday because OLED is starting to see a wider adoption and people need to understand what they are buying while the industry needs to be forced to drop Pentile.
What no Snapdragon in a PRO model?
Was really, really looking forward to this having an SD edition.
Will have to look elsewhere now or wait for a slightly less expensive 820 phone. π
The Snapdragon 820 based Mi5 costs only a tad bit more, while having vastly superior graphics and better all round processing capability (real world multitasking, synthetics etc.).
Unless someone is really, really hard pressed in the 1999 CNY price bracket, I don’t see a compelling reason why one wouldn’t spend a bit more for a much superior product.
I say this because going by your requirement, I don’t think the Mi5 3GB model is that far above the Redmi Note Pro price?
It can still come later, just kike with the Note 3. They may be waiting on a newer version of the Snap 65x series so that it is an actual upgrade of the Note 3, also in hardware.
But for sale in india they need a Snapdragon as MediaTeks are forbidden there, so if they want to sell it there, they will.
a little more?????? the mi 5 standard is going for 310 to 350 or more, from resellers thats around roughly 70(without mark up) to 130(Price with mark up) extra versus the redmi pro and as usual people are not buying an SOC only but an entire phone they may prefer an amoled screen, larger battery, better build material, Larger screen, micro sd card support and maybe even dual cameras(if implemented well) i fail to see mi 5 being “much superior”
Don’t get your panties in a bunch and your menstruation pad all soaked. Here are some facts for you:
– This Note Pro X25 4GB costs $300 as marked by Xiaomi
– When listed online, prices will be higher
– The MI5 is already available for $310 – $340 (incl. markup)
– One Mi5 is here: http://bit.ly/2aDc2gi (314 orders)
So as I said:
– The price isn’t just trivial, but also in favor of the Mi5 / SD820
– The difference in the two SoCs is vast, the 820 is far better
– The other differences you listed doesn’t make up for this
One may prefer an OLED / AMOLED display, but it doesn’t have any significant impact on day to day operation, otherwise the marked for LCD based phones wouldn’t have dominated for so long.
Build material? Are you joking? Have you even handled the Mi5? Same company, flagship grade build, beautiful finish.
To see why the Mi5 is superior, you’d have to have one like I do. Try it out if you can before hypothesizing.
My dad uses the Redmi Note 3 (SD 650 model), so going by that phone, it’s not too hard to extrapolate what the RN3 PRO will be like. No, it will not be graphene-enforced and the battery will not last till eternity. Marginal improvements of auxiliary features can never make up for a critical deficiency in an SoC, sorry.
OMG @ that price! I though it was going for some 370-380?
Is AliExpress reliable? I’ve never ordered from there before and am tempted! CallIt… Please respond!
Safe as long as you choose a reliable seller with a high reputation, and a large number of items sold (I mean the exact same item you are looking at), and you select DHL / UPS for shipping (costs around 20-25 bucks extra).
That link I posted: 314 orders, 225 feedback @ 4.6 rating, looks great. Don’t hold me at gun point later though. However, not to scare you or anything, yes, it’s completely safe.
ill continue to be objective, the reasoning behind the mi 5 having some build quality issues is because it uses glass by default making it more susceptible to breaking than the alloy in the redmi pro
as for amoled i am not making a general statement for the technologies but a comparison between the individual phones, people also buy phones for form and in the eyes of the consumer preference is important regardless of critical function i was attemtping to show you an exclusive feature that the mi5 cannot offer
continuing on that note the redmi pro has a larger screen, micro SD slot larger battery and dual cameras, 64 GB storage all reasonable reasons to pay less to get as for the SOC the x20 and 25 are strong enough to handle graphically intensive games etc being able to run 60 fps games at 42-45 and 30 at around 25
the 820’s general performance isnt twice better or leagues ahead the average consumer will see no difference, i have seen people turn down phones just for having a home fingerprint scanner so these points i mentioned are reasonable
i still fail to see the mi 5 being “much superior”
Are you really going to continue arguing for the sake of it?
1. I own an Mi5 – zero build quality issues – it is phenomenal. So what are you talking about? Can you show some YouTube videos where reviewers point out the “build issues”? Or is this once again “up in the air” hypothesizing? More susceptible to breaking? Then one should only buy Aluminium chassis phones, that’s your argument? Sure, just Google bendgate.
2. Consumers don’t give a crap about display technologies, unless the consumer happens to be an expert in the comments section of GizChina. π So going by that, the fact that the Mi5 doesn’t offer an OLED display doesn’t doesn’t really mean anything to the average consumer, who’ll probably think – if it looks good and feels good, who cares? They’ll probably not even ask to be honest.
3. Larger screen by how much? 0.35 inches? I’m guessing you can argue the other way as well? That the folks who prefer a smaller form factor will like it?
I never claimed that the 820’s performance is twice as better as the X25’s, but let’s compare the two devices here, as you also said, it’s about phones, not SoCs.
– One can buy a Mi5 right now for ~$310 (all inclusive)
– One can wait a bit and buy this RN3P-X25 for ~320 / ~330
– If the price of the RN3P-X25 is marked higher than the Mi5 by retailers, it’s a really, really shitty deal.
I will stand by this argument, and I hope prospective phone buyers won’t be stupid enough to worry about “a beautiful glass body”, “a superb display” and a “beastly cpu + gpu bar none” that they can get for cheaper than the RN3P-X25 with X% performance of this and that with an OLED display and a card slot. No way.
no hypothesizing here if i break the glass on a mi 5 the body is gone, if i bend a metal body i maybe still be able to bend it back in place
my argument is not that one should only buy metal chasis phones my argument is that there are features that the redmi pro has that the mi 5 lacks and you pay less at the same time
“Unless someone is really, really hard pressed in the 1999 CNY price bracket, I don’t see a compelling reason why one wouldn’t spend a bit more for a much superior product”
the features i showed maybe be compelling to others ill repeat them a micro sd slot, larger battey, Oled screen,dual cameras, 64 gb storage(redmi pro mid version), larger screen. i still fail to see the mi 5 being “a much superior product”
You don’t pay less. Quit misinforming people. The price from Xiaomi for the top end model is at CNY 1999, roughly US$ 302.
When listed, assuming a reasonable margin, the price will be around US $330.
Very shitty deal compared to the lower priced better spec’d Mi5, as I have maintained throughout.
They have the Note 3 Pro and the Max with SD65x.
Wrong, because for the flagship phone: X25 / 4GB etc. the listed price will be marked EVEN HIGHER, around $350-360.
I’m expecting it to start at $350 – which, for a MediaTek phone, is basically impending doom.
ORDERED! (From a different seller though).
I’m nervous since this is my first time from AliExpress, but I checked the feedback and all. Excited to have an 820 phone π
Fastcardtech and geekbuying have the mi5 3/32 version listed for $316 including shipping
I’ve just ordered the Mi5 3GB for less than $320 π (post below). No way I’d spend that kind of money on a MediaTek based phone, sorry.
Thanks for letting me now, but I’ve just ordered from AliExpress for almost the same price π
To be fair, many of the reviews I’ve seen about mi5 pointed out build quality issues, like the one on gizchina. it (that’s one I remember for sure).
Mediatek isn’t forbidden in India, Xiaomi is forbidden from selling MTK phones there. Several companies in India sell MTK phones.
I buy phones based on the entire package not just the SoC.
Just about every review of the Mi5 points out build quality issues…
And you’re confusing phones this is the Redmi Pro. The RN3P is a completely different phone.
“impending doom”. Based on what? You do realize a phone is made up of about a dozen other components besides the SoC? All of them affect the price…
That’s you and your decision, not me.
I care a lot about the SoC and have major reservations about paying big money for MediaTek phones (never will), so?
We’ll see Balco. Knowing how much you defend MediaTek while claiming no allegiance or bias, your reply is sort of expected.
But time will tell, and I hope you’re already aware of Xiaomi’s own figures of how many MTK vs QC devices they sell. The problem is, we’ll all forget this all too soon. This comment thread will become defunct, and 6 months down the line when Xiaomi will stop manufacturing this model due to piss poor sales, none of us will be willing to follow up and grill anyone who said otherwise.
So let’s just hold our horses for now, and wait for the next 6 months.
He is payed to write that… So on your personal opinion, he wrote you are wrong, as someone ask him. And he’ll get his new MTK phone, and a sandwich.
No way… Xiaomi makes just flawless products… Ask anyine on gizchina…
but i was talking about the low and mid version which are cheaper with mark up
http://www.geekbuying.com/item/Xiaomi-Redmi-Pro-5-5inch-OLED-3GB-64GB-Smartphone—Gray-370473.html
http://www.geekbuying.com/item/Xiaomi-Redmi-Pro-5-5inch-OLED-3GB-32GB-Smartphone—Gray-370485.html
a very good deal seeing it has features the mi 5 cannot offer for less
With a $5 coupon and a bunch of food stamps for the family to go along with, ha ha. Amazing how much he defends MediaTek phones and will persuade anyone to “know better”.
I defend all SoC’s, I don’t have a favorite. I just can’t stand the comments that say “X phone will be bad or overpriced because it has X SoC”. The SoC isn’t even the most expensive component in a phone, the display is. There have been terrible Mediatek SoC’s in the past, but there also have been terrible Qualcomm SoC’s. There have also been excellent SoC’s from both companies. And there is the Samsung Exnyos which is probably the best all around SoC.
So you buy a phone just for the SoC? Hypothetical scenario. You have $300 to spend on a phone and must decide between one of these two:
A. Helio X25, 4GB RAM, 128GB Rom, Sony IMX 260 (same as used in S7) with f/1.7 aperture, hifi audio chip, 4000mAh.
B. SD615, 3GB RAM, 16GB Rom, Sony IMX 220 with f/2.2 aperture, 3000mAh.
By your logic you would choose the worse overall phone (B) just because it has a Qualcomm SoC. Even though that particular SoC is one of the worst ones Qualcomm ever made. Me and most reasonable people look at the entire package of the phone, not just the SoC.
Did you even read things properly? I ordered the Mi5, and that’s an SD 820 fitted phone, not an SD 615 phone. Your B. item would have to be an SD 820 phone, and yes, I’d choose that one blindfolded every time, irrespective of what the MediaTek based A. phone would offer.
And by the way, if you want to pitch two price comparable phones together as a side by side, the Mi5 vs Redmi Pro would be an apt comparison (X25 vs 820 in terms of chipsets), given that the Mi5 costs lesser (~315 ish) now.
I, or anyone else for that matter, surely don’t have to reasonable for “your” terms. I won’t use a MediaTek phone if I’m offered one for free.
Don’t know whether he’s paid or not, but certainly is opinionated and engages as such, unnecessarily.
I mean, here I am, having spoken to another user who pointed me to a phone I was looking at for a while, on AliExpress, and I happily place an order at a superb price. So it’s a done deal, but no, let’s prove people wrong and engage in banter.
So here he is, commenting on my buying decision, on what he’d base his decision on, and the slight jab with what “most reasonable” people would do – which is go for a MediaTek device, masqueraded more politely as “look at the overall phone instead of the SoC”. Well, I choose not to, so fuck off and mind your own business maybe? Yes, I thought so.
Could very well be paid like you said, but I’ll still leave some benefit of doubt. Trolls like these are rarely taken seriously by any company, much less one that works at the scale of Xiaomi, MediaTek whatever.
Did you read things properly it wasn’t about what you ordered, it was a hypothetical scenario. So you would chose the Sd820 phone with the terrible specs just because it has a SD820. That is fanboy status!
The Mi5 is a good phone, but it doesn’t cost less. For the same spec’d version (3/32) the Redmi Pro costs $225, the Mi5 costs $300.
Yeah, resorting to calling someone a fanboy because they disagree with you or have different priorities while making a purchase, butting into conversations where your opinion wasn’t even needed in the first place (it was me and realjjj) but you felt compelled to, and generally being a dick to anyone that you have the slightest disagreement with.
I didn’t even want to argue with you any further, and if you look up, I tried to not even have a conversation with you when I said your decision is yours and not mine.
So why the fuck are you arguing and still carrying the conversation on? Why do you care a rat’s ass how people make their purchasing decisions, as irrational as they seem to you.
Unless of course, as Bojan pointed out, you’re paid to do this? I’m off this conversation. I’m not even sure why I chose to engage with a third grade troll like you on my first few comments at GizChina, some of which involved making a happy purchase where things should have ended.
Fucking useless jerk.
He has been doing this for a long time.
He has disagreements with pretty much everyone, on almost everything (except MaxPower and Yasir, for obvious reasons).
Even when it comes down to personal choices (like yours), he will still have a go at it, often trying to impose his standards as correct, dictating what constitutes rational thinking, what should be and what should not be, and how consumers should act. Just like he termed you a “fanboy” for prioritizing an SD 820 chipset based phone over whatever the other was.
My advice: Don’t respond to a single comment on his in the future (if you’re still around). He’ll still rain piss on the comments threads, attacking you, displaying passive aggression for various kinds, name calling, but you just have to ignore things and scroll past it.
Swearing and name calling and you call someone else a “third grade troll”. I use the fanboy comment when it applies. Saying you would choose a worse phone just because it has a certain SoC, when every other component is worse is full fanboy.
It’s okay to be a fanboy where all fanboys of something, I am a fanboy of Xiaomi, you are a fanboy of Qualcomm. Much easier to just admit it.
Not paid to write anything my comments are 100% original but my status in the Chinese community has got me free phones in the past. And both my current phones use a SD chip so nice try, but I will take that Sandwich!
Most reasonable people would go for the best value for the money. A fanboy such as yourself buys phones based only on the SoC, reasonable people buy phones based on the entire package.
“Trolls like these” Considering I have been given free phones to both test out and keep by several companies, I don’t fit your definition of a troll. But it is fun getting you all riled up, you Qualcomm fanboys are so easy to mess with.
I correct people that are mistaken, I have no allegiance to a SoC company. I currently use two Qualcomm phones. I have also used Kirin and Exnyos phones. There are good Mediatek SoC’s and crap ones, there are good Qualcomm chips and crap ones.
Funny thing is some of my favorite phones of all time had Qualcomm SoC’s, like Xiaomi Mi4 and Mi3, anyone who is a regular here can attest to that.
“He has disagreements with pretty much everyone, on almost everything (except MaxPower and Yasir, for obvious reasons).”
What are those obvious reasons, if I may ask?
It is clear that @KittyPride is clearly not enjoying your unnecessary, uncalled for corrections, and yet you persist in spite of it being mentioned, claiming “it is fun getting you all riled up, you Qualcomm fanboys are so easy to mess with”. Are you really an adult?
What got you so engaged and worked up in the first place? That he/she was persuaded to buy a QC phone at a good price and you couldn’t persuade her otherwise? Or the fact that he/she chose not to argue with you (this is the likely one) and ignored your opinion.
That’s reason for you to constantly subtly insult someone again, and again, on the correctness of their purchasing decisions?
Quit trolling people and get a life, seriously.
Here’s really just doing this for fun. You guys are easy to troll, you know?
What are these obvious reasons, pray tell?
Are you really an adult? Quit trolling me and get a life, seriously.
yeah mod, add fuel to the fire xD
“I have no allegiance to a SoC company. I currently use two Qualcomm phones”
This proves only that, despise the fact you work for MTK, you secretly know deep inside yourself that MTK suck ballz and QC is the way to go ! xD
Actually if I had my choice I would choose Exnyos over all of them but they come in so few phones and I don’t like Samsung phones.
I bet you had a Meizu Pro 5 !
BTW this thread should be renamed “10 things you need to know about balco”
Nope I have only owned one Meizu phone it was an MX5. Before that I had a Xiaomi Mi4.
Wow, the honest admittance does reflect so nicely on you, you know. Somehow balco trolling others who have tried not to converse with him is ok, and going by the sound of what you just posted, you too enjoy it when it’s him attacking and making others miserable, right? Easy to troll? why, because they have a different opinion than yours, or different priorities which doesn’t match yours?
Classy. On with the name calling now, but I’m out.
You avoided the real question though – on why you engage with people and mock their decisions while having “fun”, even when they don’t want to argue with you?
You avoided the real question though – why are you trying to be all “noble” while essentially doing the same thing with me?
Read what @Nolan said up top, the part about not responding. Sensible advice.
Full video review here. Nothing out of the extraordinary. So much for dual cameras, OLED diplay, and that overclocked MTK chip. What an overpriced device really.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n_fuH7IvB-M
Can’t understand what he is saying but based on the video this isn’t even close to an in depth review, I’ll wait for some reviews from the usual droid sites before deciding either way.
The video was updated the same day redmi pro was launched. It takes so little time for a review nowadays, don’t know why GC keeps us hanging for weeks… Probably in order ro raise up the hype ?
’cause they’re lazy westerners that can’t keep up the chinese pace ^^ GC boss should throw ’em 1 month in a shaolin monastery to teach ’em what ‘involvement’ means xD
lol π
BIG Spoiler:
Redmi Pro
It’s going to launch in India with SD652.. I know few people in Xiaomi and all those pics are from a test unit only thing I was not able to use is bokeh effect..
Hi, do you know when the SD version will be available for sale?
2 or 3 months max.
YOU ARE WRONG!
Following rn3’s naming, this is going to be “redmi pro pro” ?
Yes, haha
Vivid colors lol
That’s how TVs were marketed in the 90’s. Vivid is marketing for oversaturated, it’s something you want to avoid.
What you get with Pentile is fraud, it simply isn’t 1080p.There are no marketing standards for how to define a pixel and they shamelessly abuse that. At least we have marketing standards for bananas…
You also get low brightness with OLED unless there is an overdrive mode (see the OnePlus 3 or the Meizu Pro 6) and contrast is only higher in theory, just because it is OLED it doesn’t mean the contrast is high.
As far as i know, they source the display from 2 China display makers and remains to be seen if they’ve managed to get quality to reasonable levels.
Edit’: the brightness listed in the specs is 350nit and that’s low.Not sure yet if they have an auto boost when outdoors.
This was confirmed on Weibo as well, but the content was quickly taken down after a heated exchange between the groups there (one of whom was representing the second display maker).
Anyway, just get ready for flak – coz you know, MediaTek is the best there is and anyone who says otherwise on GizChina…… well π
Mediatek isn’t the best but it’s not crap like most people make it out to be. On this site there is no consensus on what chip is best. Some say SD, some say Mediatek others say Exnyos.
Well, this year it’s easy… SD820 don’t even have competitors… Then Exinos and few steps back Kirin and X20/25,followed by a little with SD65* (witch is even better solution for international markets, plus it’s more open to XDA).
On the CPU side Kirin is better in both perf and efficiency at load. SD820 with all 4 cores fully loaded goes to about 6W (ideally you want to stay bellow 3.5W) so devices in general can sustain that load for 20-30 seconds.Then they would drop to about 1.5GHz for the higher clocked cores and 1.2-1.3 GHz for the other 2 cores and that might last for 1.5mins before it has to drop further.Ofc power management will differ from device to device,some like the Zuk Z2 Pro (thin with a glass back) seem to throttle a lot harder.
The Mate 8 can keep all 4 big cores fully loaded for1.5 mins and all cores are at 2.3GHz not 2+2 like SD820.It’s a much more honest offering.
Adreno goes to town against Mali though
The SD820 has the best GPU but the Exnyos 8890 is the best overall chip, the Kirin 955 an Helio X25 aren’t too far behind. A SoC is made up of a lot more than just a GPU and that’s all most people look at, even if they don’t play the most demanding games that can take advantage of that GPU.
Newer generation Oled panel doesn’t have colour accuracy issue. Samsung super amoled panel now are highly colour accurate as modern led ips panel or even more. Brightness is also high on those panel, maybe not as high as led panel. Pentile matrix panel are a huge issue since they halves the ppi it usually has. Xiaomi must have used cheap Chinese Oled panel, Those Oled panel doesn’t have the true zero blacks and because of that contrast are lower but still higher than normal led IPS panel. I think vivo and meizu must have used same chinese panels on their phones. And Oled do have infinite contrast do to their near zero black level. Display calibrators do have one of those contrast detector machine that reads the ANSI contrast ratio and usually Oleds are unmeasurable.You can read about Oled panel on displaymate.com they have written a good article about Oled.
I never said they have color accuracy issues,the article was saying “vivid colors” and found that funny. Some device makers do aim for vivid colors instead of accuracy though.Like OP3 before the update.But again,i never said that OLED has poor color accuracy, was just amused by the marketing term used here.
Brightness is only high if they have a boost mode for outdoors and not everybody has that. And I was pretty clear about that. yes Samsung goes to above 550nits but many others have low brightness and this one is listed at 350nits.It’s fine for indoors and nothing unusual for mid range but it is low compared to the best screens.
Contrast is higher on paper. It is higher for the best ones but many are only matching the best LCDs.So at about 3.5k while good ones go to 4.5k.
Most people have the wrong image about OLED.They think they are better but they don’t know what Pentile is and these kind of claims about contrast and blacks are being spread without any realism and without also listing the areas where OLED can be lacking.
On paper OLED has some advantages but also has some disadvantages and one must also remember that not all quality grades are created equal. Pentile is the big thing that ruins it and makes it fraud.- to be fair we are not 100% certain this one is Pentile but it’s 99% safe to assume it is.
Most users think that OLED is better even when it isn’t. RGB OLED with reasonable power consumption would be nice but nobody is offering that anymore in phones.
This matters today a lot more than yesterday because OLED is starting to see a wider adoption and people need to understand what they are buying while the industry needs to be forced to drop Pentile.
For the most part but it can also throttle hard in some games and let Kirin almost catch up. It would be preferable if they would clock it at 400-500MHz but they push it a bit too far to win in benchmarks. The thing is that those don’t really matter. What a user needs is a certain FPS in actual games at on-screen resolution.
In PC you don’t need the new Titan X at 1.2K$ if you have a 1080p screen. In phones, because nobody is testing the GPUs in actual games, people still aim for “the best”
Anyway, Adreno is fast and likely they have an area advantage too , at least vs the current gen Mali, we’ll see how the G71 does next year.
Full video review here. Nothing out of the extraordinary. So much for dual cameras, OLED diplay, and that overclocked MTK chip. What an overpriced device really.
Can’t understand what he is saying but based on the video this isn’t even close to an in depth review, I’ll wait for some reviews from the usual droid sites before deciding either way.
The video was updated the same day redmi pro was launched. It takes so little time for a review nowadays, don’t know why GC keeps us hanging for weeks… Probably in order ro raise up the hype π
’cause they’re lazy westerners that can’t keep up the chinese pace ^^ GC boss should throw ’em 1 month in a shaolin monastery to teach ’em what ‘involvement’ means xD
lol π
BIG Spoiler:
Redmi Pro
It’s going to launch in India with SD652.. I know few people in Xiaomi and all those pics are from a test unit only thing I was not able to use is bokeh effect..
Hi, do you know when the SD version will be available for sale?
Following rn3’s naming, this is going to be “redmi pro pro” π
Yes, haha
2 or 3 months max.
YOU ARE WRONG!
I just want a cheap redmi with same build and same front fingerprint scanner
Well, even though MTK for me personally is NO GO, i can understand that it is perfect for lower and mid-range devices.
Only thing (beside so many Xiaomi payed articles as this one, and “comments” made by xiaomi bots, instead of them pey for real commercials) that i don’t like about this device is it’s price… I mean, for almost same price, or just 50$ more, i can buy Mi5.
ZUK Z2 is even cheaper…
But, now, we have one more option for our money.
Hope it will be better made device then Mi4i
The Mi4i was a terrible device, most of that was due to the SD615. That is one of the few phones from Xiaomi that has ever been terrible.
I just want a cheap redmi with same build and same front fingerprint scanner
Well, even though MTK for me personally is NO GO, i can understand that it is perfect for lower and mid-range devices.
Only thing (beside so many Xiaomi payed articles as this one, and “comments” made by xiaomi bots, instead of them pey for real commercials) that i don’t like about this device is it’s price… I mean, for almost same price, or just 50$ more, i can buy Mi5.
ZUK Z2 is even cheaper…
But, now, we have one more option for our money.
Hope it will be better made device then Mi4i
The Mi4i was a terrible device, most of that was due to the SD615. That is one of the few phones from Xiaomi that has ever been terrible.
I don’t understand why any phone should have a second camera for depth informations, since upper grade Sony Exmor RS do great bokeh effects. If someone has any clue…
I don’t understand why any phone should have a second camera for depth informations, since upper grade Sony Exmor RS do great bokeh effects. If someone has any clue…